The principle of dynamic equilibrium, where a system’s outcome or event is not a linear process but rather a shifting and non-linear balance of feedback mechanisms. In a community experiencing systemic social inequality, such as the continuing example of disproportionate policing of racial minorities, the community may adapt by implementing programs, such as restorative justice initiatives or advocacy for policy reform. As these programs begin to reduce inequality and improve community relations, the focus and resources allocated to these initiatives may diminish, reflecting the feedback loop of dynamic equilibrium. As the community stabilizes, the momentum of change slows, but the system continues to adapt and shift toward greater equality.

The demand for change in this example, which is an outcome of the inequality this specific community faces, is catalyzed by human involvement and organizing. In line with the fifth principle of dynamic equilibrium, the sixth principle highlights change as an inevitable process, where nature will eventually take its course to balance out the system over time. Moreover, change is a positive state of existence because it does not lock social groups into one state of existence; the absence of change suggests social groups are stuck in their positions, with no mobility, regardless of how much work is put into enacting a form of change. Work, effort, and energy from people, groups, communities, and organizations significantly accelerate the rate of change. Dynamic equilibrium and change work hand-in-hand, with feedback loops signaling a need for change, whether negative (reducing harmful practices) or positive (amplifying solutions). In societal systems, such as institutions, organizations, and communities, human capital, or the knowledge, skills, and experiences of individuals, moderates the pace of this change…  See, Applying the Principles of Systems Thinking Framework to Human Rights