Menu

Systems Thinking Framework

Human Rights, as a topic of inquiry and a social event, is a complex problem that cannot be solved through simple answers. Researchers, scholars, experts, and professionals, irrespective of their vocational training and areas of expertise, often engage with the question of human rights, because their, ultimately, touches on human rights. Unlikely other topics of human concern, where interest is driven by the need to directly and purposefully produced a desired outcome, our interest in human rights was driven by the need to prevent something from happening: human rights abuse. Because of this distinction, much work must be done not to identify the determinant system that produces human rights abuses, but the contributory systems that result in human rights abuses. This explains the varying interests in human rights across disciplines and vocations. For this and other reasons that are discussed on this platform, the systems thinking framework, or more accurately some Principles of the Systems Thinking Framework, presents itself as the most appropriate lens through which the production of knowledge on the subject of human rights.

From this page, readers and contributors can take part in

.

00BlueLine

Systems Thinking Framework and the Discourse on Rights Read about it...

Recent Articles

  • Volunteerism, Inequity, and the Right and Responsibility of Work
      Volunteerism is often celebrated as altruistic, yet in unequal contexts it can both exploit unpaid labor and deny vulnerable individuals opportunities for paid work. This article argues that while the right to work is fundamental to dignity, work must also be understood as a responsibility: to sustain oneself, provide for dependents, and fulfill the

    Read more

  • Applying the Principles of Systems Thinking Framework to Human Rights
    By Max Sorenson In an increasingly interconnected world, the challenges to human rights are rarely confined to single causes or isolated incidents. From systemic racism and mass displacement to entrenched economic inequality, these issues are shaped by complex networks of social, political, and institutional forces. Systems thinking offers a critical framework for understanding and addressing

    Read more

  • A new paradigm for defining and promoting human rights 
    by Ema Paskevicius Although the concept of human rights suggests that every individual is entitled to certain basic human rights, how exactly are they upheld in various circumstances? The answers to these questions are often proposed by researchers, scholars, and professionals in various academic disciplines and professional areas of expertise. In this research note, we

    Read more

  • Sovereignty and Human Rights
    Sovereignty is a fundamental concept in international relations and law, defining the authority of a state to govern itself without external interference. However, in the modern era, sovereignty is increasingly discussed in relation to human rights. This article explores the concept of sovereignty in the context of human rights and its significance in ensuring—or hindering—the

    Read more

  • Applying the Systems Thinking Framework to Human Rights
    The Systems Thinking Framework is not a new approach to problem solving. It is, however, unknown or new to most researchers and scholars active in the broad areas of scholarly inquiry known as social sciences and the humanities. For scientists and researchers in physics and biological, engineering, and computer sciences however, systems thinking has been

    Read more

00BlueLine

More on Systems Thinking...

A new paradigm for defining and promoting human rights 

by Ema Paskevicius Although the concept of human rights suggests that every individual is entitled to certain basic human rights, how exactly are they upheld in various circumstances? The answers to these questions are often proposed by researchers, scholars, and professionals in various academic disciplines and professional areas of expertise. In this research note, we will consider whether there is an academic discipline of “human rights”, the meaning of “human rights”, and how the systems thinking framework could potentially bridge the gap between the various definitions of human rights proposed by scholars in various disciplines to advance the aims of human rights. Academic disciplines and human rights Academic discipline can be best defined as a distinct branch of knowledge that bases its main ideas on a particular area of study. Academic disciplines help us organize the vast range of human knowledge into certain categories, such as humanities, social sciences, and scientific disciplines. Humanities focuses on the study of human culture, which can include subcategories such as language, philosophy, literature, and art. In terms of their applications to human rights standards, philosophers, for example, may analyze and theorize concepts underlying human rights such as justice and equality. They may ask abstract questions that surround their fundamental principles such as – What are the moral obligations to adequately uphold human rights? How do human rights differ from a universal versus a cultural perspective? Philosophers tend to work on a more theoretical level, where they explore political ideologies, ethical guidelines, and legal frameworks and they may contribute their work through scholarly articles and books, rather than direct action and application. Their academic discipline may be explored through various concepts such as philosophy, history, and law. But, given that the humanitarian discipline is not just limited to philosophers, there are other professions that fall […]

Sovereignty and Human Rights

Sovereignty is a fundamental concept in international relations and law, defining the authority of a state to govern itself without external interference. However, in the modern era, sovereignty is increasingly discussed in relation to human rights. This article explores the concept of sovereignty in the context of human rights and its significance in ensuring—or hindering—the protection of fundamental rights. Sovereignty refers to the right and power of a governing body to regulate its own affairs without outside interference. Traditionally, sovereignty has been understood in two primary ways: (1) The authority of a state to govern itself, make laws, and enforce policies within its borders, and (2) The recognition of a state’s independence and autonomy by other states and international organizations. Historically, sovereignty was considered absolute, meaning that states had the unrestricted power to decide their internal matters without outside interference. However, with the rise of international law and globalization, the notion of sovereignty has evolved, particularly in relation to human rights. The expectation is that a sovereign state has the duty to protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens. Governments create laws, enforce justice, and establish institutions that uphold human rights, such as freedom of speech, equality before the law, the right to education, freedom from state-sanctioned or state-tolerated torture. The principle of sovereignty allows states to adopt and implement human rights frameworks that align with their social, cultural, and historical contexts. Moreover, sovereignty enables states to resist external forces that may threaten their citizens’ rights. For example, a strong sovereign government can protect its people from exploitation, foreign domination, or economic manipulation by other nations or entities. On the other hand, sovereignty is sometimes used as a justification for human rights violations. Some states argue that external actors have no right to interfere in their internal affairs, even […]

Applying the Systems Thinking Framework to Human Rights

The Systems Thinking Framework is not a new approach to problem solving. It is, however, unknown or new to most researchers and scholars active in the broad areas of scholarly inquiry known as social sciences and the humanities. For scientists and researchers in physics and biological, engineering, and computer sciences however, systems thinking has been used to successfully build a formidable body of knowledge solving some of the most difficult problems and explaining mysterious phenomena. Explaining systems thinking as it applies to human rights, a topic of interest to scholars in almost all academic and professional fields of study, and as it is applied by scholars of human rights is a challenging task, let alone convincing scholars to adopt it in their research and teaching. Notwithstanding all the above, given the complexity of the topic of human rights, systems thinking can be a compelling framework for explaining the forces behind some of the most egregious human rights abuses throughout history and across cultures. The degree of success in applying the framework to human rights largely depends on researchers’ ability to define the elements of the framework, for the definitions will greatly vary. Therefore, providing definitions of what is a “systems thinking framework” is a good place to start. At the core of the Systems Thinking Framework (STF) is the idea of “system”. To be sure, engaging with the concept of systems thinking requires a capacity to process many things at the same time including the meanings and functions of “system” and “systems thinking”. Systems thinking presupposes the existence of “system” as being the engine behind an event: if a thing happens, such a thing must be the outcome of a system. Here, the use of the word “system” requires a break with the generalized and specialized use of the term […]

00BlueLine

Articles, Documents, Essays, Reviews...

RSS HUQUQ: Human Rights in Context

  • The Boy Who Cried Human Rights October 24, 2025
    Once upon a time, there was a powerful boy named America who stood at the edge of the world and cried, “Human rights! Human rights!” And the world listened. He marched against dictators, helped rebuild nations after war, and spoke boldly at the United Nations about justice, freedom, and equality. When villages far away were […]
    Michael Schuster
  • Nations’ Borrowing from the Future Betrays the Basic Norms of Rights October 22, 2025
    Abstract: National debt is often framed as an economic necessity—a tool for growth, stability, and strategic investment. Yet history reveals that debt has also been a recurring instrument of decline, eroding empires, undermining sovereignty, and transferring the cost of ambition onto future generations. This essay argues that public debt must be understood not only in […]
    Research Assistants
  • From Bookstore to Empire: The Case of Amazon October 15, 2025
    Hoarding and Human Rights  Introduction This essay examines the distinction between the creation and transfer of wealth through the lens of Amazon’s business model and its broader implications for economic ethics and human rights. It argues that legitimate wealth arises through two primary paths: the production of goods and services, or their distribution through trade […]
    HUQUQ Research Team
  • The First Step to Genocide Is a Word October 11, 2025
    The Way Dehumanization Paves the Path to Atrocity Every genocide and every crime against humanity is rooted in one deliberate act: the dehumanization of its victims. Study any instance of genocide, mass atrocity, war crime, or systematic violence—and you will find a consistent, chilling pattern. Before the violence begins, a narrative is constructed to justify […]
    HUQUQ Research Team
  • The Foundation of All Rights September 24, 2025
    Freedom of Speech Abstract Freedom of speech, thought, and conscience constitute the cornerstone of all human rights. Without the capacity to articulate claims, challenge authority, and bring grievances into the public sphere, other rights remain inaccessible and unenforceable. Drawing on the ideas presented in Muslims and the Western Conception of  Rights , this essay argues […]
    Research Assistants
  • Added Value and Human Rights September 5, 2025
    Cocoa and the Economics of Global Inequity AbstractThe denial of “added value” lies at the core of global economic inequity and its human rights consequences. While underdeveloped countries supply the raw materials that fuel global industries, developed economies capture the real wealth by processing, branding, and selling finished goods. Cocoa is a striking example: West […]
    Research Assistants
  • The Genocide Scholars’ Resolution on Gaza–Implications for International Law and Western Legitimacy September 1, 2025
    On August 2025, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS)—the most authoritative academic body in the field of genocide studies—adopted a landmark resolution declaring that Israel’s actions in Gaza constitute genocide as defined under the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention. This resolution, endorsed by 86 percent of the world’s leading genocide scholars, represents a pivotal […]
    HUQUQ Research Team
  • Business and Human Rights: Ethical, Legal, and Managerial Perspectives August 17, 2025
    Florian Wettstein’s Business and Human Rights: Ethical, Legal, and Managerial Perspectives is a timely and ambitious intervention in a field that is still solidifying its contours. Business and Human Rights (BHR) has emerged in recent decades as both a scholarly discipline and a policy arena, spurred by the rise of globalization, corporate power, and mounting […]
    Research Assistants
  • Volunteerism, Inequity, and the Right and Responsibility of Work August 13, 2025
      Volunteerism is often celebrated as altruistic, yet in unequal contexts it can both exploit unpaid labor and deny vulnerable individuals opportunities for paid work. This article argues that while the right to work is fundamental to dignity, work must also be understood as a responsibility: to sustain oneself, provide for dependents, and fulfill the […]
    HUQUQ Research Team
  • The Algorithmic Erasure of Atrocity: AI, Politics, and the Struggle for Human Rights August 12, 2025
    Abstract: This article examines the intersection of artificial intelligence, political influence, and human rights, focusing on how large language models (LLMs) respond to allegations of mass atrocities such as the Uyghur genocide in China and the situation in Gaza. Drawing on documented instances—including the suspension of the Grok chatbot from X after citing credible human […]
    Research Assistants